Benefit — knowing your category first

What it saves you to know before someone else asks

Every sponsor already has a Category A / B / C stance on every trial AI it runs. The question is only whether the sponsor knows it before the BIMO inspector, EMA rapporteur, DSMB chair, IRB, or diligence partner does.

The four moments

  1. FDA BIMO inspection or Type C meeting. Reviewer asks about AI-in-clinical-decision-support governance. If you already know you are A, the answer is a one-page hand-off. If you don't know, the follow-up probes reveal the gap in real time.
  2. EMA scientific-advice request. Response window is short. Knowing the category BEFORE lets the sponsor build the response around the record, not around the missing record.
  3. DSMB pre-read or IRB continuing-review. Board asks the AI-governance question. A/B/C answer + one-page evidence + named remediation is the credible response. "We think it's fine" is not.
  4. Diligence / investor review / partner licensing. AI-governance section on the diligence questionnaire. Attaching the Snapshot is the answer. Not attaching means answering narratively and hoping.

Cost of learning your category the wrong way

Reactive stance cost: external counsel + rush-audit + remediation-under-fire typically runs 5-20x the cost of the same discipline applied ahead of time. And the reactive-response record does not carry the same credibility.
Multi-stakeholder chain: once the category becomes visible via one channel (BIMO, EMA, DSMB, IRB, diligence partner), the other channels typically converge within 6-18 months. Sequential response cost stacks.
Proactive stance cost: $499. Below sponsor procurement threshold. Direct-buy. 3 business days. A/B/C determination + 3 fix-first items + signed declaration.

What "knowing" changes operationally

Who at your org cares

$499. 3 business days.

Answer the question every stakeholder eventually asks — before they ask it.

Buy $499