Education Vertical — Sample Snapshot

What your $499 Snapshot report looks like

Full sample: 8-layer determination + 3 fix-first items + 3 distributional-shape charts + counterparty-question rehearsal + independent-verifier declaration. Same structure your institution's actual Snapshot delivers within 3 business days.

Buy your institution's Snapshot — $499 Learn more
Category C -- Insufficient For Title VI + OCR Attestation

This is what a failed admissions-AI-reproducibility audit looks like — $499 to know if yours is next

High-severity distributional-drift events. Cohort A3 (first-gen mid-low-income) deny-lane rate rose 24% -> 68% silently. Your institution's Snapshot uses the same structure -- your data, your AI, your jurisdictional footprint. $499. 3 business days.

Buy $499 in 2 clicks See sample below

Sample scenario

R1 / R2 or well-endowed private research university ($1B-$5B endowment, 25,000-65,000 applications per admission cycle) running an AI decision-support classifier that scores each applicant and routes to lane:

  • Auto-Admit (score 0-33): strong applicant, auto-admit recommendation
  • Committee Review (score 34-66): borderline applicant, requires human committee review
  • Deny / Waitlist (score 67-100): deny or waitlist recommendation

Silent drift: post-Day 45, Cohort A3 (mid-low-income, first-generation-college, under-resourced public school applicants) systematically over-routed to deny-or-waitlist lane at 68% vs baseline 24% — a 44 percentage-point cohort-differential that never triggered an alarm on the institution's enrollment-management dashboard.

Overall Determination

CATEGORY C — INSUFFICIENT FOR ATTESTATION. 10 high-severity distributional-drift events detected. Institution should not represent the admissions-recommender AI as Title VI-compliant, Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard-defensible, or Department of Education Office for Civil Rights (OCR) inspection-ready until named remediation completes.

The 3 sample charts (your Snapshot delivers similar for your data)

Rolling mean admissions-recommendation score by cohort
Rolling mean admissions-recommendation score by applicant cohort — silent Cohort A3 divergence starts Day 45
Baseline vs recent distribution for Cohort A3
Cohort A3 baseline vs recent recommendation-score distribution — mass shifted into deny-or-waitlist lane
Lane rate per cohort baseline vs recent
Lane rate per cohort baseline vs recent — Cohort A3 deny-lane rate rose materially while others stable

The one sentence your institution's own General Counsel would care about

The AI admissions-recommender's deny-or-waitlist lane rate for Cohort A3 (mid-low-income, first-generation-college, under-resourced public school applicants) rose from 24% to 68% over the audit period — a 44 percentage-point cohort-differential that occurred silently while the institution's aggregate admission-rate + yield-rate dashboard showed all-green throughout.

Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC Sec. 2000d) plus Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (600 U.S. 181, 2023), any AI-driven admissions decision from the affected period that produces disparate-impact through socioeconomic-proxy variables is subject to OCR investigation, DOJ Title VI referral, State AG consumer-protection inquiry, accreditor site-visit finding, and potential Higher Education Act Section 498 Title IV federal student-aid eligibility challenge.

What your institution's actual Snapshot includes

SectionWhat you get
Scope + regulatory frameworkNamed accreditor footprint + Title VI + Title IX + SFFA v. Harvard + FERPA + OCR AI guidance + State AG regime + accreditor AI-in-decision-making standards + HEA Section 498 Title IV eligibility
Sensor summaryIndependent-observer specifics, distinct model family, retention pipeline distinct from your Slate / Element451 / EAB Navigate / Salesforce Education Cloud / Ellucian / Workday Student stack
Findings summaryCount of drift events + high/medium severity + cohort-differential flag + first-drift-day
Overall determinationCategory A / B / C w/ specific meaning + remediation-path recommendation
3 fix-first itemsScoped to YOUR admissions AI surface, YOUR accreditor footprint, YOUR next OCR-inspection or accreditor site-visit cycle
Detailed drift eventsEvery drift event day + type + affected cohort + severity + plain-language detail
Counterparty-question rehearsal5 sample decisions from the target-day w/ cryptographic decision-hash reproducibility verification suitable for OCR / DOJ / State AG / accreditor / class-action counsel production
Upgrade pathsBaseline ($2,500 / 5 days) OR Enterprise Attestation ($35-55K / 3-6 weeks board-ready) + $499 Snapshot credit applies
Independent-verifier declarationSigned by Kevin Luddy personally
Charts + artifacts3 distributional-shape charts + machine-readable JSON + decision-hash lookup table

Regulatory framework applied

Read the full sample report

Full Snapshot Report (markdown) Executive One-Pager (markdown)

$499. Three business days. Your institution's actual Snapshot.

Same structure as this sample. Your institution's data, your admissions AI system, your accreditor footprint, your regulatory-framework citations. Big-4 higher-ed consultancy equivalent (Deloitte Higher Education practice, EY Education advisory, AACRAO third-party AI audit) delivers this same outcome for $200K-$1M+. Kevin ships it at 5-10% of that cost.

Buy your Snapshot — $499
Snapshot credit ($499) applies to Baseline ($2,500) or Enterprise Attestation ($35-55K) upgrade within 30 days. Direct-buy Stripe. Below-procurement-threshold. Report PDF via email within 3 business days.