Enterprise SKU

The audit your regulator would run — before they do

Independent AI-observability risk assessment for enterprise systems in regulated verticals. 3-6 weeks. Board-ready deliverables. Reproducible methodology.

The problem enterprise AI has

Your AI systems don't fail on the metrics you're watching. They fail silently — retrieval collapses onto stale documents, routers pick confusable neighbor sections, confidence distributions flatten, prompt libraries drift week over week. Traditional accuracy metrics move last. By the time the number changes, the regulatory exposure is already priced in.

Silent failures don't show up in dashboards. They show up in OCR letters, DOI examinations, SEC inquiries, and bar-complaint filings.

This audit finds them first.

Vertical framings

The audit is framed as a regulatory-readiness risk assessment. Vertical scope determines the framework overlay:

Healthcare AI

Clinical decision support, EHR AI, prior-auth, radiology, patient-facing chat, drug-interaction systems.

HIPAA + FDA AI/ML Guidance + State laws

Financial Services AI

Credit decisioning, fraud detection, algo-trading, robo-advisory, AML surveillance.

SR 11-7 + OCC + SEC + FINRA + NYDFS + CFPB

Insurance Underwriting AI

Rating, pricing, claims triage, fraud detection, adverse-action decisioning.

NAIC AI Model Bulletin + State DOI + Colorado SB21-169

Legal AI

Contract review, litigation support, e-discovery, legal research, brief drafting.

ABA Rules 1.1/1.6/3.3/5.3 + State Bar UPL + Privilege + FRE

Methodology

Seven deterministic sensors + proprietary multi-sensor consensus orchestration + confounding-signals-style temporal root-cause analysis.

Deterministic sensors, not more AI

Arithmetic over signals your pipeline already produces. Same inputs in, same numbers out, every time. Runs continuously; no LLM calls internal to the audit engine.

Multi-sensor consensus

Proprietary orchestration layer applies N-LLM consensus across the sensor catalog to identify root causes, not just symptoms. Divergences between sensors surface as flagged findings for human review.

Temporal reasoning

When multiple sensors alert, the earliest-alerting sensor is the causal suspect; later-alerting sensors are downstream effects. 13-turn documented advantage over single-sensor investigation.

Reproducible outputs

All sensor code is MIT-licensed and open source. Client can independently reproduce findings post-audit. The orchestration layer is proprietary; findings that rely on it are noted.

Deliverables

Four audience-tier written deliverables plus two live briefings plus a 60-day post-engagement check-in.

Board Memo

2-page governance-ready summary. Fit for board / board committee / executive sponsor consumption. Findings + regulatory exposure + management's proposed remediation posture.

Executive Summary

5-10 pages for VP / CTO / CAIO consumption. Findings by severity, risk ranking, prioritized 30/60/90-day remediation plan.

Technical Deep-Dive

30-50 pages for the AI engineering team. Per-system findings, root-cause chain reconstruction, sensor output data, code-level remediation guidance where applicable.

Sensor Deployment Plan

10-20 pages. 90-day observability roadmap: which sensors to deploy, calibration guidance, threshold tuning, escalation ladder, governance model.

Two live briefings

Executive briefing (2 hours, up to 8 attendees) + Technical deep-dive session (3 hours) for Client's AI engineering team.

60-Day Check-In

Post-engagement review of remediation progress + deployment status + any new findings. Written summary memo delivered within 5 business days of the check-in call.

Investment

$35K – $55K

Depending on scope: number of AI systems, compliance framework layering, delivery mode, timeline compression.

Milestone-based invoicing: 30% initiation / 40% midpoint / 30% final. Net-30 payment terms. Payment via Stripe direct link, ACH, or Client AP system.

When you need this

Post-incident — silent failure surfaced through customer complaint or regulator inquiry
Pre-launch — new AI system going into a regulated workflow
Governance-driven — board or investor requirement for AI risk assessment
Insurance-driven — underwriting requirement for AI-liability coverage
Regulatory-inquiry-driven — DOI, OCR, SEC, FDA, or bar-complaint engagement in progress or anticipated
M&A-driven — AI-risk diligence on an acquisition target

Independence & standards

No financial interest in Client's AI systems, vendors, or model providers. No affiliate relationships. No revenue-share arrangements.

Professional Liability (E&O) at $1M per occurrence / $2M aggregate is standard for engagements. Certificate of Insurance provided at engagement kickoff.

Client data handling: Data stored on encrypted workstation only; never uploaded to third-party services; deleted within 30 days of engagement completion. Business Associate Agreement (BAA) executed for HIPAA-covered engagements.

How the engagement runs

  1. Discovery call30 minutes. Scope your situation. No obligation.
  2. Discovery questionnaire2-3 hours of your team's time. Scopes systems, compliance posture, stakeholders, timeline.
  3. SOW drafted, reviewed, signed2-5 business days after discovery. Milestone billing agreed.
  4. Engagement beginsKickoff within 5 business days of signed SOW.
  5. 4 phases: Discovery / Sensor Deployment / Findings / Deliverables3-6 weeks depending on scope.
  6. Executive briefing + technical deep-diveLive sessions. Board memo delivered separately.
  7. 60-day check-inIncluded. Remediation progress reviewed.

Book a discovery call

30 minutes. No obligation. If we're a fit, next step is discovery questionnaire.

Request discovery call Explore the sensor catalog

contrarianAI is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Deliverables reference regulatory frameworks for client-orientation purposes. Client-specific regulatory analysis should involve Client's counsel and, where appropriate, external regulatory counsel.