Legal Vertical -- Sample Snapshot Hub

Plaintiff PI firm case-intake AI failed silently. This is the $499 Snapshot that found it.

Casual-glance overview here. Every deeper claim is a click away: full sample report, each cited rule, every chart, every finding — and "how does this help me?" companion pages for each.

Buy your firm's Snapshot -- $499 Full sample (long-form)

The 4-number quick verdict

Determination

Category C

High-severity drift events

C3 SIU/fraud-review rate

18% → 71%

Days silent before detection

45+

What does Category C actually mean? →

What happened in one paragraph

A mid-market plaintiff PI firm's AI case-intake triage classifier silently over-routed client segment C3 (age 40-55, mid-income) into the SIU/fraud-review lane. The firm's case-management dashboard stayed green throughout. The differential was visible only through per-segment distributional-shape analysis by an independent verifier. Under FRCP 37(e), every AI-driven intake decision from the affected period is now subject to preservation duty once litigation is reasonably anticipated.

Read the full scenario walkthrough →

The three charts (each linked to its own deep-dive)

Chart 1 · Deep dive Rolling mean by client segment Where the silent C3 divergence begins. What the eye sees vs what the case-management dashboard reported. Chart 2 · Deep dive Baseline vs recent distribution C3 mass moved RIGHT (into SIU/fraud-review lane). How to read the shape shift. Chart 3 · Deep dive Lane rate per client segment C3 SIU/fraud-review rate rose sharply while other segments stayed stable. The pattern plaintiff counsel + carriers look for.

Rules applied — each on its own page

Every cited rule has a dedicated subpage with the actual regulatory text, plain-English translation, what the Snapshot shows against it, and a "how does this help me?" benefit companion.

Rule FRCP 37(e) -- spoliation on AI decisions Preservation duty on AI-driven case-intake records once litigation is reasonably anticipated. Rule State bar AI-competence rulings 35+ states as of March 2026. California COPRAC enforceable rule. NC state bar 2026-01-13 guidance. Rule Malpractice-carrier renewal questionnaire Aon / Marsh / Beazley / CNA legal-liability desk AI-governance section on renewal. Rule Adverse-impact statistical method / Rule 23 Class-adjacent exposure when AI-driven routing shows segment-differential outcomes. Rule FCC TCPA -- AI-generated communications If any part of intake uses AI-generated calls / texts. Michigan mass-tort firm 2026 class action set precedent. Rule (shared) NIST AI RMF 1.0 GOVERN / MAP / MEASURE / MANAGE. Voluntary but load-bearing baseline.

Findings + methodology deep dives

Methodology How Category C is derived Category A / B / C decision logic. Why 7 high-severity events on the C3 signal = C. Methodology Counterparty-question rehearsal The 5-decision reproducibility drill your firm's defense counsel + malpractice carrier will thank you for. Methodology Independent-verifier declaration Why the control plane cannot reside within the entity being regulated.

The full records

Full Snapshot Report (markdown) Executive One-Pager (markdown) Long-form single-page view

$499. Three business days. Your firm's actual Snapshot.

Same structure as this sample. Your firm's data, your firm's AI system, your firm's jurisdictional footprint, your firm's regulatory citations. Below procurement threshold. Report PDF via email.

Buy your Snapshot -- $499

Snapshot credit ($499) applies to Baseline ($2,500) or Enterprise Attestation ($35-55K) upgrade within 30 days. Big-4 legal-consultancy equivalent for the Enterprise tier: $200K-$1M+. Same deliverable outcome, 5-10% of the price.